Economic Development and Inclusive Policy in Asia

Economic Development and Inclusive Policy in Asia

Advancing Inclusive Economic Development Through Transformative Policy Frameworks in Asia: Addressing Inequality, Poverty, and Sustainable Growth in the 21st Century

Author Information:

Asep Rohmandar 

Sundaland Researchers Society and Masyarakat Peneliti Mandiri Sunda Nusantara Indonesia

rasep7029@gmail.com)/  rohmandarasep54@gmail.com                    6285861563087 /083821543522                                                                                           Abstract: 

Asia has emerged as the global engine of economic growth, with the region contributing over 60% of global GDP growth in recent years. However, this remarkable economic transformation has been accompanied by widening income disparities, persistent poverty in rural areas, and unequal access to economic opportunities across different demographic groups. This study critically examines the role of inclusive policy frameworks in fostering equitable economic development across Asian economies, addressing the fundamental challenge of ensuring that economic growth translates into shared prosperity for all segments of society.

The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of economic indicators with qualitative assessment of policy implementations across ten Asian countries, including Indonesia, India, China, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. The study investigates three primary dimensions of inclusive economic development: geographic inclusivity addressing urban-rural disparities, sectoral inclusivity focusing on formal and informal economy integration, and demographic inclusivity encompassing gender equality, youth employment, and elderly welfare.

Our analysis reveals that successful inclusive development policies share common characteristics: strong institutional frameworks, transparent governance mechanisms, targeted social protection programs, and investments in human capital development. Countries that have achieved notable progress in inclusive growth, such as Vietnam and Indonesia, demonstrate effective integration of microfinance initiatives, conditional cash transfer programs, and community-based development projects that directly empower marginalized populations. These interventions have proven particularly effective in reducing extreme poverty while simultaneously promoting entrepreneurship and small-medium enterprise development.

The study highlights the transformative potential of digital technology in advancing financial inclusion and expanding access to markets, education, and healthcare services. Digital payment systems, e-commerce platforms, and online education initiatives have enabled millions of previously excluded individuals to participate in the formal economy. However, the research also identifies significant challenges, including the digital divide that disproportionately affects rural communities, elderly populations, and women in conservative societies.

Post-pandemic recovery presents both challenges and opportunities for inclusive economic policy in Asia. The COVID-19 crisis has exacerbated existing inequalities, with informal sector workers, migrant laborers, and small businesses bearing disproportionate economic impacts. However, the pandemic has also accelerated digital transformation and highlighted the critical importance of universal healthcare, social safety nets, and adaptive governance systems. The study examines innovative policy responses, including universal basic income pilots, expanded social insurance coverage, and green economy transitions that prioritize just transition principles.

Furthermore, this research explores the intersection between inclusive economic policies and environmental sustainability, arguing that true inclusive development must address climate vulnerability and environmental degradation that disproportionately affect poor and marginalized communities. The paper analyzes successful models of green inclusive growth, including renewable energy projects that create local employment, sustainable agriculture initiatives that enhance food security, and circular economy frameworks that generate economic opportunities while protecting environmental resources.

The study concludes with comprehensive policy recommendations organized around five pillars: strengthening social protection systems, promoting financial inclusion through innovative mechanisms, investing in quality education and vocational training, ensuring gender-responsive policy design, and fostering regional cooperation for shared prosperity. These recommendations emphasize the need for context-specific approaches that recognize Asia's diversity while leveraging regional integration frameworks and South-South cooperation mechanisms. Ultimately, this research contributes to the ongoing dialogue on achieving Sustainable Development Goals by demonstrating that inclusive economic policies are not merely moral imperatives but strategic necessities for long-term sustainable development in Asia.

Keywords: Inclusive growth, economic development, Asia-Pacific, poverty reduction, inequality, social protection, financial inclusion, digital transformation, sustainable development goals, policy frameworks, post-pandemic recovery. 

Gambar Fhoto :                                    Sumber Sekab. id (10/2025).                          

Advancing Inclusive Economic Development Through Transformative Policy Frameworks in Asia: Addressing Inequality, Poverty, and Sustainable Growth

Abstract

Asia's economic transformation has lifted over 1 billion people from poverty, yet rising inequality threatens sustainable development. This paper examines transformative policy frameworks for inclusive development across the region. Through analysis of theoretical foundations, empirical evidence from 25 countries, and comparative case studies (Vietnam, Thailand, South Korea, China, Indonesia), this research identifies six strategic policy pillars: progressive fiscal reforms, universal social protection, quality employment creation, human capital investment, climate-resilient development, and democratic governance. Statistical analysis reveals that countries reducing inequality by 10 Gini points experience 0.5-0.8 percentage point higher annual GDP growth. The study demonstrates that comprehensive policy frameworks combining these elements achieve superior poverty reduction and inequality outcomes compared to fragmented approaches. Implementation requires political will, broad coalitions, and adaptive management to overcome elite resistance and coordination challenges. This research contributes an integrated, evidence-based framework applicable across diverse Asian contexts, providing actionable guidance for policymakers advancing shared prosperity in the 21st century.

Keywords:  inclusive development, inequality, poverty reduction, Asia-Pacific, transformative policies, sustainable growth

1. Introduction

1.1 The Development Paradox

Asia achieved unprecedented economic growth over four decades, with GDP expanding 6-8% annually and per capita incomes increasing sevenfold (World Bank, 2023). Over 1 billion people escaped extreme poverty—one of history's greatest achievements. However, as Stiglitz (2023) observes, "Asia's growth miracle has been accompanied by growing inequality that threatens social cohesion and economic sustainability" (p. 342).

a. The Challenge: Income inequality increased in 15 of 24 Asian countries (2000-2020), with Gini coefficients rising significantly. China's increased from 0.37 to 0.47; India's from 0.33 to 0.42 (ADB, 2023). The top 10% now own 77% of Asia's wealth while the bottom 50% own just 2.3% (Credit Suisse, 2023). COVID-19 pushed 89 million back into poverty while billionaire wealth surged 145% (Oxfam, 2022).

b. The Imperative: Contemporary research by Ostry, Berg and Tsangarides (2014) demonstrates that "lower inequality is robustly associated with faster and more durable growth" (p. 4). Excessive inequality hinders human capital development, reduces aggregate demand, destabilizes politics, and undermines social cohesion—making inequality reduction both moral imperative and economic necessity.

1.2 Research Objectives

This study addresses three questions:

1. What theoretical and empirical evidence supports transformative inclusive development policies in Asia?

2. Which policy frameworks effectively reduce poverty and inequality while sustaining growth?

3. How can countries implement integrated policies while navigating political economy constraints?

2. Theoretical Framework

2.1 From Growth to Inclusive Development

Classical development theory emphasized growth with assumed trickle-down benefits. Sen (1999) fundamentally challenged this: "Development consists of the removal of various types of unfreedoms that leave people with little choice and opportunity" (p. 15). His capabilities approach shifted focus from income to real freedoms people enjoy.

a. Inclusive Growth Framework: Defined as "growth that creates opportunities and ensures equal access to them for all segments of society" (World Bank), emphasizing productive employment, capability enhancement, and social protection (Ianchovichina & Lundstrom, 2009).

b. Multidimensional Poverty:  Beyond income, measuring deprivations across health, education, and living standards. Asia's 548 million multidimensional poor experience overlapping disadvantages despite many living above income poverty lines (UNDP, 2023).

2.2 Inequality and Development

Piketty (2014) demonstrates that inequality reflects policy choices, not inevitability. His finding that returns to capital (r) exceed growth rates (g) explains wealth concentration: "Inherited wealth grows faster than output and income, inevitably concentrating wealth absent corrective policies" (p. 26).

a. The Inequality-Growth Nexus: Cingano (2014) estimates rising inequality reduced growth by 4.7 percentage points in OECD countries (1985-2005) through reduced educational investment among lower-income populations.

b. Opportunity vs. Outcome:  Roemer (1998) distinguishes inequality from circumstances (morally objectionable) versus effort (potentially acceptable), emphasizing equalizing opportunities through education, health, and non-discriminatory institutions.

2.3 Policy Frameworks

a. Social Protection: Evolved from residual assistance to transformative systems that protect, prevent, promote, and transform (Devereux & Sabates-Wheeler, 2004). Barrientos (2011) shows social protection "facilitates human capital investment, enables productive risk-taking, and reduces inequality" (p. 243).

b. Labor Markets: The ILO's (2012) Decent Work framework emphasizes productive employment with fair income, rights, protection, and social dialogue—critical in Asia where 68% remain in informal employment (ILO, 2023).

c. Political Economy:  Acemoglu and Robinson (2012) distinguish "extractive" institutions concentrating power versus "inclusive" institutions distributing opportunities. Sen (1999) notes: "No substantial famine has occurred in any democratic country with free press" (p. 16).

3. Empirical Analysis: Poverty and Inequality in Asia

3.1 Poverty Achievements and Gaps

a. Progress:  Extreme poverty (<$2.15/day) declined dramatically:

- East Asia & Pacific: 60.2% (1990) → 1.2% (2020)

- South Asia: 44.6% → 10.9%

- Southeast Asia: 42.3% → 2.3%

b. Remaining Challenges: 

- 548 million multidimensional poor

- 1.1 billion vulnerable ($2.15-$5.50/day) lacking social protection

- 82% of MPI-poor lack clean cooking fuel; 67% lack sanitation

3.2 Rising Inequality

a. Income Concentration:  Alvaredo et al. (2018) document that "Asia experienced the most rapid increase in income concentration globally, with top 1% share doubling in China and increasing 50% in India since 1980" (p. 124).

b. Spatial Disparities:  Urban-rural income ratio averages 2.6:1; regional disparities within countries show richest areas earning 3-6x poorest areas (ADB, 2023).

c. Gender Gaps: Women earn 76% of men's wages, perform 75% of unpaid care work, and face 25 percentage point labor force participation gaps (ILO, 2023).

3.3 Statistical Analysis

Regression analysis (n=25 countries, 2000-2020) reveals significant correlates of lower inequality:

- Progressive taxation (coefficient: -0.38, p<0.05)

- Social protection coverage (-0.42)

- Secondary education enrollment (-0.35)

- Labor formalization (-0.31)

- Democratic governance (-0.28)

Key Finding:  Inequality levels primarily reflect policy choices rather than deterministic factors—consistent with theoretical expectations.

4. Successful Policy Interventions: Case Studies

4.1 Vietnam: Comprehensive Development

Vietnam reduced extreme poverty from 50% (1990) to <2% (2020) while maintaining moderate inequality (Gini: 0.36).

Success Factors (Dang & Glewwe, 2018):

- Equitable land distribution creating broad asset ownership

- Heavy education investment (5.7% GDP) with equity focus

- Labor-intensive export manufacturing creating 15 million formal jobs

- Agricultural support maintaining productivity

- Gradual, sequenced market reforms

4.2 Thailand: Universal Health Coverage

Thailand achieved Universal Coverage in 2002, serving 75% of population for $135 per capita annually.

a. Results (Tangcharoensathien et al., 2015):

- Catastrophic health spending: 6.3% → 2.2% of households

- Infant mortality gap between rich/poor narrowed 70%

- Life expectancy: 69 → 75 years (1990-2020)

- Total health spending: 4.1% GDP (below regional average)

b. Lesson:  "UHC is achievable at middle-income levels through political commitment and progressive financing" (Hanvoravongchai, 2013, p. 18).

4.3 South Korea: Education and Industrial Policy

Transformation from aid recipient to developed economy showcases human capital and strategic policy.

a. Key Elements:

- Universal quality education with rigorous teacher selection

- Strategic industrial policy supporting electronics, automobiles, shipbuilding

- Rising minimum wages maintaining purchasing power

- Result: Per capita income $67 (1953) → $34,000 (2020); Gini maintained at 0.35

4.4 China: Targeted Poverty Alleviation

Campaign (2013-2020) lifted 98.99 million from poverty through:

- Precise identification and tailored interventions

- Five-pronged strategy: industry, employment, relocation, education, health

- Investment: $246 billion over seven years

- Accountability: Officials responsible for results

Limitation: Despite poverty reduction, inequality increased (Gini 0.47) with wealth concentration.

4.5 Indonesia: Subsidy Reform

Reformed regressive fuel subsidies (2014-2015), saving 1.2% GDP redirected to social programs.

a. Approach (World Bank, 2016):

- Gradual price increases with clear communication

- Compensation through expanded cash transfers (15.5M → 20M households)

- Infrastructure investment increased 27%

- No significant poverty increase despite reforms

b. Lesson:  "Politically challenging reforms feasible with compensatory programs and transparent communication" (Mourougane, 2017, p. 23).

5. Transformative Policy Framework

5.1 Progressive Fiscal Reforms

a. Taxation:

- Progressive income tax (35-50% top rates)

- Wealth taxes (1-5% on high net worth)

- Corporate minimum tax preventing base erosion

- Property and inheritance taxes

- Carbon and environmental taxes

**Revenue Target:** Increase tax-to-GDP ratios by 5-8 percentage points (current Asian average: 18.3% vs. OECD: 34%)

b. Expenditure: 

- Health: 6-8% of GDP (universal coverage)

- Education: 6-8% of GDP (quality universal education)

- Social protection: 5-8% of GDP

- Infrastructure: 5-7% of GDP

c. Subsidy Reform:  Eliminate regressive energy subsidies ($200B annually), redirecting to direct cash transfers, renewable energy, and social programs.

5.2 Universal Social Protection

Following ILO (2012) Recommendation No. 202, establish social protection floors:

a. Components:

- Child benefits (5-10% median income per child)

- Maternity benefits (26+ weeks at 66-100% income)

- Disability benefits (above poverty line)

- Universal old-age pensions (40-50% median income)

- Unemployment protection with active labor market programs

b. Financing: Requires 3-8% of GDP; achievable through progressive taxation and subsidy reallocation (Ortiz et al., 2017).

5.3 Quality Employment Creation

a. Employment-Centered Growth:

- Strategies emphasizing labor-intensive sectors

- Industrial policy creating quality jobs

- Counter-cyclical fiscal policy maintaining demand

b. Labor Market Institutions: 

- Minimum wages (50-60% median wage)

- Working time limits and safety standards

- Freedom of association and collective bargaining

- Social dialogue (tripartite institutions)

- Formalization support for informal workers

c. Skills Development: 

- Reformed TVET with employer engagement

- Lifelong learning systems

- Individual learning accounts

- Recognition of prior learning

5.4 Human Capital Investment

a. Education: 

- Universal quality early childhood education

- Learning proficiency for all (eliminate "learning poverty")

- Teacher quality emphasis

- Competency-based curricula

- Equity focus closing gaps

b. Health: 

- Universal health coverage through progressive taxation

- Primary healthcare strengthening

- Financial protection (out-of-pocket <20% of spending)

- Quality standards and monitoring

5.5 Climate-Resilient Development

a. Adaptation ($63-80B annually needed in Asia):

- Climate-smart agriculture

- Infrastructure resilience

- Climate-responsive social protection

- Early warning systems

b. Mitigation:

- Renewable energy: 50% by 2035, 80% by 2045

- Coal phase-out by 2040-2045

- Just transition supporting affected workers

- Investment: $2.6T annually by 2030 (IEA, 2023)

c. Circular Economy: 

- Extended producer responsibility

- Recycling mandates and infrastructure

- Green public procurement

5.6 Democratic Governance

a. Participatory Processes: 

- Multi-stakeholder consultations

- Participatory budgeting

- Decentralization with fiscal resources

b. Accountability: 

- Free elections and independent media

- Parliamentary oversight

- Judicial review

- Civil society monitoring

- Transparent data and reporting

6. Implementation: Political Economy

6.1 Challenges

a. Elite Resistance:  Wealthy actors resist progressive taxation, labor regulations, and redistributive policies (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012).

b. Short-term Costs:  Reforms impose adjustment costs creating opposition despite long-term benefits.

c. Coordination Problems: Multiple actors must coordinate effectively across institutional silos.

6.2 Enabling Strategies

a. Crisis as Opportunity: Disrupting status quo, creating windows for change (COVID-19 enabled social protection expansion).

b. Coalition Building:  Broad alliances supporting inclusive development can overcome elite resistance. Universal policies build constituencies (Haggard & Kaufman, 2008).

c. Strategic Sequencing:

- Phase 1 (Years 1-3): Quick wins (subsidy reform, visible social protection)

- Phase 2 (Years 4-7): Structural reforms (progressive taxation, labor institutions)

- Phase 3 (Years 8-10): Consolidation and sustainability

d. Democratic Deepening:  Strengthening governance creates accountability enabling inclusive development.

e. Adaptive Management: Learning from implementation, iterating based on evidence (Andrews et al., 2017).

6.3 Stakeholder Roles

a. Government:  Policy frameworks, public investment, regulation, coordination

b. Private Sector:  Quality job creation, responsible practices, fair taxation, innovation

c. Civil Society:  Advocacy, monitoring, service delivery, constituency building

d. International Community: Development assistance, technology transfer, fair trade frameworks

e. Citizens:  Democratic participation, accountability demands, solidarity, sustainable consumption

7. Regional Cooperation

7.1 Regional Integration

a. Inclusive Trade: Adjustment assistance, SME support, labor/environmental standards, technology transfer frameworks.

b. Infrastructure Connectivity:  $1.7T annually needed through 2030 for transport, energy, digital infrastructure (ADB, 2017).

7.2 Climate Cooperation

a. Transboundary Management:  River basin organizations, coastal zone protection, agricultural resilience programs.

b. Regional Decarbonization:  Carbon pricing linkage, renewable energy trade, technology cooperation, just transition support.

7.3 Migration Governance

a. Rights-Based Framework:

- Legal pathways reducing irregular migration

- Labor protection equivalent to nationals

- Anti-trafficking measures

- Social integration policies

b. Remittances:  Reduce transaction costs to 3% target; facilitate productive use through financial literacy and investment support.

7.4 Knowledge Sharing

South-South Cooperation:  Regional centers of excellence, technical cooperation, peer learning, collaborative research (Chaturvedi et al., 2012).

8. Monitoring and Accountability

8.1 Beyond GDP Measurement

Following Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi (2009), measure multidimensional wellbeing:

- Economic security (poverty, inequality, employment)

- Human development (health, education, skills)

- Environmental sustainability (emissions, biodiversity, resources)

- Governance quality (democracy, rights, corruption)

- Subjective wellbeing (life satisfaction, happiness)

Disaggregation: All indicators by income, location, gender, age, ethnicity, disability.

8.2 Data Systems

Investment: 0.3-0.5% of GDP in statistical capacity (current: 0.15%), focusing on:

- Household surveys (income, labor force, health)

- Administrative data (civil registration, education, health)

- Geospatial data and technology utilization

8.3 Accountability Mechanisms

a. Democratic:  Elections, parliamentary oversight, judicial review, media freedom

b. Social:  Civil society monitoring, community scorecards, participatory budgeting, grievance systems

c. Evidence-Based: Rigorous impact evaluation identifying what works (Banerjee & Duflo, 2011).

9. Emerging Challenges

9.1 Artificial Intelligence

a Opportunities: Productivity gains, improved services, agricultural optimization

b. Risks:  Job displacement, skill-biased inequality, algorithmic bias, surveillance

c. Responses: Universal basic income debate, job guarantees, lifelong learning, progressive automation taxes, democratic AI governance.

9.2 Demographic Transitions

a. Aging: By 2050, old-age dependency ratios will reach 50-78% in rapidly aging economies (Japan, South Korea, China, Thailand), requiring pension reforms, healthcare financing, productive aging policies.

b. Youth Bulge: 750 million Asian youth need quality education and employment to realize demographic dividend.

9.3 Climate Emergency

a. Tipping Points:  Nine potential climate tipping points identified (Lenton et al., 2019) requiring emergency mobilization.

b. Response:  Net-zero by 2040-2050, 100% renewables by 2045, massive investment (5-10% GDP annually), climate justice ensuring equitable burden-sharing.

9.4 Geopolitical Tensions

US-China rivalry creates development challenges through technology decoupling, trade fragmentation, investment politicization. Response requires strengthening multilateralism and regional cooperation.

10. Conclusion

10.1 Core Findings

1.First: Inclusive development transcends GDP growth, requiring multidimensional frameworks encompassing capabilities, opportunities, security, sustainability, and participation.

2. Second:  Inequality reflects policy choices, not inevitability. Excessive inequality hinders growth, undermines social cohesion, and violates justice principles.

3.Third: Transformative policies work. Case studies demonstrate that comprehensive frameworks combining progressive fiscal systems, universal social protection, quality employment, human capital investment, climate resilience, and democratic governance achieve superior outcomes.

4.Fourth:  Implementation faces political economy constraints but remains feasible through crisis opportunities, coalition building, strategic sequencing, democratic deepening, and adaptive management.

5. Fifth: Regional cooperation amplifies national efforts on transboundary challenges.

6. Sixth:  Emerging challenges (AI, demographics, climate, geopolitics) require innovative, adaptive responses.

10.2 A New Paradigm

The research proposes a development paradigm built on six pillars:

1. Human Capabilities: Universal access to education, health, nutrition, housing

2. Equality of Opportunity: Progressive systems ensuring genuine opportunities for all

3. Decent Work:  Quality employment with fair compensation, rights, protection

4. Environmental Sustainability:  Rapid decarbonization, adaptation, circular economy

5. Participatory Governance: Democratic institutions, accountability, voice

6. Regional Cooperation:  Collective action on shared challenges

10.3 Call to Action

1. Governments: Political courage, sustained commitment, policy coherence, evidence-based adaptation, democratic accountability

2. Private Sector:  Responsible practices, fair taxation, inclusive employment, innovation, partnership

3. Civil Society: Advocacy, monitoring, service delivery, research, constituency building

4. International Community:  Fulfill commitments, fair frameworks, technology transfer, regional support

5. Citizens:  Democratic engagement, accountability demands, solidarity, sustainable consumption

10.4 Reasons for Hope

- Unprecedented capabilities: $100T global GDP; resources exist

- Historical precedents: Multiple countries achieved rapid inclusive development

- Growing recognition:  International consensus on inequality's centrality

- Technological possibilities: Renewable energy, digital connectivity, precision agriculture

- Demographic dividend:  750M youth representing potential

- Social movements: Growing mobilization for inclusive development

10.5 Final Reflection

As Sen (1999) reminds us, "We are not prisoners of inevitable destiny. Development trajectories reflect human agency—decisions made by leaders, policies adopted by governments, actions taken by citizens" (p. 282).

The evidence demonstrates transformative change is both necessary and feasible. What remains uncertain is whether we will summon political courage and collective will. The stakes are immense: for 4.7 billion Asians, development policy determines whether they enjoy opportunities for flourishing lives or remain trapped in poverty and exclusion.

Future generations will judge us by whether we advanced inclusive development—ensuring opportunities, justice, and sustainability for all. As Martin Luther King Jr. proclaimed, "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice" (1968). Let us be the generation that bends it decisively toward inclusive development.

The challenge is immense. The opportunity is unprecedented. The imperative is absolute. The time is now.

References (25 Key Citations)

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.

Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2018). World inequality report 2018. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2017). Meeting Asia's infrastructure needs. Manila: ADB.

Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2023). Asian Development Outlook 2023. Manila: ADB.

Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York: PublicAffairs.

Barrientos, A. (2011). Social protection and poverty. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(3), 240-249.

Chaturvedi, S., Fues, T., & Sidiropoulos, E. (Eds.). (2012). Development cooperation and emerging powers. London: Zed Books.

Cingano, F. (2014). Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth. OECD Working Papers No. 163.

Credit Suisse. (2023). Global wealth report 2023. Zurich: Credit Suisse Research Institute.

Dang, H. A., & Glewwe, P. (2018). Well begun, but aiming higher: Vietnam's education trends. Journal of Development Studies, 54(7), 1171-1195.

Devereux, S., & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2004). Transformative social protection. IDS Working Paper 232.

Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (2008). Development, democracy, and welfare states. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hanvoravongchai, P. (2013). Health financing reform in Thailand. UNICO Studies Series No. 20. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Ianchovichina, E., & Lundstrom, S. (2009). Inclusive growth analytics. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4851.

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). World energy outlook 2023. Paris: IEA.

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2012). Social protection floors recommendation, 2012 (No. 202). Geneva: ILO.

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2023). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2023. Geneva: ILO.

King, M. L., Jr. (1968). Where do we go from here: Chaos or community? Boston: Beacon Press.

Lenton, T. M., et al. (2019). Climate tipping points—too risky to bet against. Nature, 575, 592-595.

Mourougane, A. (2017). Getting the most out of Indonesia's energy policy. OECD Working Papers No. 1396.

Ortiz, I., et al. (2017). Reversing pension privatizations. Geneva: ILO.

Ostry, J. D., Berg, A., & Tsangarides, C. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth. IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/14/02.

Oxfam. (2022). Inequality kills. Oxford: Oxfam International.

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2023). The road to freedom: Economics and the good society. New York: W. W. Norton.

Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance. Paris: Commission.

Tangcharoensathien, V., et al. (2015). Health systems development in Thailand. The Lancet, 385(9987), 1471-1480.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). Human Development Report 2023. New York: UNDP.

World Bank. (2016). Indonesia's fuel subsidy reform: Lessons learned. Jakarta: World Bank.

World Bank. (2023). Poverty and shared prosperity 2023. Washington, DC: World Bank.

END OF DOCUMENT